i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoScientific progress is declining due to bureaucratization of research. Scientific innovations should make ‘zero to one’ breakthroughs, instead making ‘one to many’ improvements to existing innovationswww.livemint.comexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1226arrow-down133
arrow-up1193arrow-down1external-linkScientific progress is declining due to bureaucratization of research. Scientific innovations should make ‘zero to one’ breakthroughs, instead making ‘one to many’ improvements to existing innovationswww.livemint.comi_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareTheHolyChecksum@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down4·1 year agoOf course not. Capitalism is only good for a very tiny subset of the population’s bank accounts.
minus-squarei_have_no_enemies@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down8·1 year agowhat about creativity? does it promote creativity?
minus-squareDenvil@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoIt promotes money. If creativity happens to align with that, then yes.
minus-squareRichCaffeineFlavor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·1 year agoRemoved by mod
Of course not. Capitalism is only good for a very tiny subset of the population’s bank accounts.
what about creativity? does it promote creativity?
It promotes money. If creativity happens to align with that, then yes.
deleted by creator
Removed by mod