• just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Because a vpn can monitor all the websites that you visit. Not directly what you’re looking at, but definitely where you’re looking. Just line your provider can, if you’re not using a vpn. But at least with your provider, you have a contract with them - you pay them to transport your data and nothing more. Some very scummy providers aside, that’s where it stops.

    A free vpn, however, needs to pay for transporting your data somehow. And if you’re not paying for it with money, then who/what is?

    See also Tom Scott’s explanation about vpns, why you probably don’t need one, and why he refused their advertisement money.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s not even free, the service itself is a payed subscription. But it’s there and it could be working and funneling data without the user knowing it if they wanted to.

      • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I’m interested to hear what you think a vpn will protect you against. Or what you think the flaws in Toms arguments are.

        Edit: I don’t know about you, but I trust my own, GDPR-backed isp far, far more than I trust whichever foreign based vpn company. Especially if they for it for free or cheap.

          • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The only thing you’re “protecting” yourself from by using a vpn to surf the Internet, is your own provider. It won’t stop any spying software on your phone, or any nefarious scripts on the websites you visit.

            Tom’s argument was more nuanced than that, which is why I linked it. I suggest you watch it and explain where he’s wrong if you want to give your argument to ignore him any weight. Ad hominems and “imagined” arguments alone won’t get you very far, I’m afraid.