I work with AI every day at my job. My buddy is a literal AI researcher and we hobby-build together too.
I’m not concerned with what you think is “objective truth” when you have no idea what you’re talking about.
I work with AI every day at my job. My buddy is a literal AI researcher and we hobby-build together too.
I’m not concerned with what you think is “objective truth” when you have no idea what you’re talking about.
Yes this is an argument in my favor, you just don’t understand AI/LLMs enough to know why.
That’s certainly an opinion you have
the people stealing data
No one is doing this
Output doesn’t matter since it’s pretty well settled it’s not derivative work
Cool, discussion over.
I agree. For instance, it should be secured in law that you can train AI on anything, to avoid frivolous discussions like this.
Output is what should be moderated by law.
If it’s not a violation of copyright then this is a non-issue. You don’t need permission to read books.
at their expense
How?
Why do you have free reign to do the same?
AIs don’t learn as a human would, and comparisons can’t be made between the learning processes.
I think you’re going to have a hard time proving a financial distinction between them
There’s a third solution you’re overlooking.
3: OpenAI (or other) wins a judgment that AI content is not inherently a violation of copyright regardless of materials it is trained upon.
Cool. I’m down with that.
No minimum parking, no height limit, no maximum FAR, no maximum unit count.
yeah get rid of these next and you’re set.
It’s gonna take a lot of work, man. The regulatory capture here is extreme.
Everyone wants to point to capitalism for this, but this is what happens when you kneecap any economic system. That’s why it’s all over the world.
Dude there is a universe worth of difference between eating at a restaurant and being asked to tip like, a good truck or some shit.
Baristas post on their social media about giving non-tippers decaf all the time.
I’m completely unaware of this, and this is stupid.
You tip people who live on tips for a living, and in places of high, but not elite, quality.
This is literally my ideal world.
You personally have sex maybe 20 times with various peers before you reach your 18th birthday.
But surely this is already the norm, yeah? Who is sexually active and has sex less than 20 times? Did you mean 20 partners?
They’re not replicating OF, their advertising their OF, and there’s nothing about twitch or these streams that explicitly advertises to children.
When you sell something to someone, you’re not exploiting them. You’ve got some terms mixed up here.
You could make similar arguments about gambling being a moral panic and they shouldn’t ban that on the site.
I mean yeah, banning gambling is weird as fuck and just creates black markets
For further clarity on why this was a funny mixup, to anyone who sees this, Plex is also a thing, but it is a very different thing, just with a very similar name.
I don’t understand how any of this is a problem. Just, like, parent your fuckin kids.
This is one step from “take the books out of libraries” level of paternalism
It’s “how little can I tip before they tamper with my food”
Normal people never, ever think this.
My entire premise hinges on the fact that these papers agree with me.