An erra is to come to an end as the Eu says enough is enough and introduces new rules and hefty fines.

  • Rob200@lemmy.autism.placeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Hey comment section I forgot to add the URL to this post before posting it earlier today, I added it in now.

  • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 hours ago

    What does it mean to “open up” an operating system in this context? Do they mean something like the possibility to intall other OSes on their devices, or that the app stores needs to be more open? I’m guessing it does not mean they have to start open source:ing parts of the OS… or?

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Probably to allow proper sideloading of apps, instead of the contrived bullshit they already tried to pull.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I would love if device makers were forced to open up their hardware to other OSs. Unlockable bootloaders for all as well as allowing users to install their own signing keys so secure boot can remain enabled.

      Granted, there would still be black box firmware required to use half the components inside, but that’s another battle.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      From the last paragraph, it sounds like the intent is to make it easier to switch devices and services, which would be great

    • Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      We are talking about lawmakers making this demand. They don’t have a fucking clue what the difference is between all these possibilities.

  • demesisx@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Let’s go one further and compel Apple, Microsoft, and Google to open source their entire operating systems. :)

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I am almost certain there would be two major impacts from that. The first being that operating system development would slow to the pace that the community wishes instead of having big money behind it. And the second is that security updates would come quite a bit faster.

      Edit: I figure brand new major features would be slower in coming. But security would be improved.

      • nfms@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The operating system that runs most servers, a lot of them doing web cloud and networking, with high levels of security (developed by security companies) is open source, the *BSD distributions and also Linux.
        But I also have doubts if this is the right move.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          But I also have doubts if this is the right move

          Can you share those and the reasoning, please?

  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Apple opening up would makes to mean toward them more. Still, I’m only going to get a new phone after 2026, after the EU’s battery mandate in force.