• Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Instagram has it’s fair share of blame for the trend, but I don’t think they were the progenitor, as it were. Snapchat was far more heavy-handed with face altering filters from the get-go, as I remember it. Instagram was mostly just the “old-school” sepia tone, black-and-white type filters for the most part until that picked up.

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Meta should probably never be blamed for innovating when all they do is steal ideas from potential competitors and crudely duct tape them onto existing products. Instagram was once a useful, good app and now it’s 80% features from Snapchat and TikTok and you maybe see a friend’s post a week late.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Now now, they innovated by turning Facebook from the way you could see what your friends were doing on your feed into algorithmically determining exactly which batshit insane ‘news’ stories from cranks and posts from crazy people would be the most effective rage bait to specifically you once they figured out that anger and rage are the most effective way to cause retention and engagement.

        They basically scientifically perfected trolling, and figured out how to monetize it.

        Sure it widely proliferated dangerous anti science nonsense, bigotry, racism, sexism, homophobia, fostered the Q Anon insanity mind plague and facilitated it going mainstream, but hey, hate sells.

  • Lojcs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    Filters will not be going away altogether on Instagram. First-party filters created by Meta will continue to be available.