- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
You must log in or # to comment.
yet another useless
featureannoyanceAndroid already blocks sideloading by default at an operating system level.
Which is a sensible choice security-wise.
it is, the useless annoyance is what Samsung is introducing
it is, the useless annoyance is what Samsung 's Version of Android is
introducing.… thats the same thing
Thatsthejoke.jpg
Sorta
I’m just pointing out that the entirety of Samsung’s Android adds literally nothing of value to the user to the android experience and only serves to, at best, annoy. Not just this one particular feature.
I think perhaps something has gone wrong with the phrasing or something, because it seemed you were saying the exact same thing but … less clearly?
it is, the useless annoyance is what Samsung*'s Version of Android* is
which now I edit that so it doesn’t have a strike through I actually understand what you mean. It was a bit difficult to parse that originally
My bad
Is it? Android already disables sideloading by default, requires each source to ask for permission, and prompts the user before each install. How does Samsung’s additional setting improve security?
no. the notion that sideloading is bad for security is apple propaganda
Apple should take this approach
Not really
You can disable it by default
You can see the instructions to disable it in the screenshot of the thumbnail.
This article is pointless.
Came here to say exactly this. Dumb rage bait.
It is also only enabled by default on new phones and during OOBE setup there’s a toggle for this.
deleted by creator
I think that’s just the nature of smartphone related journalism at the moment. It’s sort of a reflection of where the industry is at: lacking substance and focused on short-termism above all else. In the media this translates to a never-ending hype circle around the latest releases, rumours and “leaks”. Everything else has some clickbait name and a bunch of poorly written, irrelevant filler to pad out the “article” for SEO purposes.
The question in the title is just a hook, but this is still an article, not a Q&A.
The text tells why the feature matters, tells it’s redundant, lists the phones affected by it, echoes some Samsung notes about the feature, and answers the question. It’s a report on a particular feature, I wouldn’t call it a filler.
- Return the Samsung phone
- Buy from a company that isn’t hostile towards its customers
1.) Don’t buy a Samsung phone
My last Samsung phone was the Galaxy S1
Why so much hate on Samsung?
Besides what the other user said, they recently made it a requirement for accredited phone services that they destroy any samsung phones along with their data, that they receive for servicing, if they have found that the user has done “unauthorized servicing” on it.
This is the next step after making the phones practically impossible to be disassembled, which they have done years ago.
What are some of the best alternatives? With comparable specs (in the US)?
Right now I have a Fold and honestly really like the foldables. Though I think the Pixel Fold is my only alternative there.
I think the Pixel Fold might be the best option for a foldable phone, because (just like all other Pixels) you can flash it with a private, secure, open-source ROM like GrapheneOS.
I believe you can purchase the OnePlus Open in the US. It’s listed on their US website and I have heard of people living in the US using it.
