Moviewyrm
tommi.space
A concept for an IMDb/TMDb alternative, a fork of Bookwyrm made for movies.

I love the Fediverse and I love cinema 🍿, I don’t think I am the only one…
I am surprised nobody has realized a Fediverse software for movies, yet!

I am tired of IMDb, and any other alternative is centralized, proprietary software.

What I think could be done is to develop a fork of @bookwyrm@tech.lgbt with the same features, but some key differences that make it the go-to solution for tracking movies you want to watch and that you watched, as well as sharing your thoughts with your friends. I already emailed @tripofmice@friend.camp, Bookwyrm’s creator and main maintainer, about this possibility.

I am keeping notes concerning this idea in the link for the post.

Unfortunately, even though I am a Fediverse enthusiast and I cannot stop talking about it with everybody, I am no developer and I cannot practically start working on this, also because my time is too limited to work on such a software. Nevertheless, I hope writing this post could inspire somebody to code something and start a Fediverse platform for movies! 😍

Of course I am available for anything else concerning the project: website creation, marketing, bug testing and community moderation, etc.

Thanks a lot for your time!

Happy holidays,
Tommi 🤯

  • abbenm@lemmy.ml
    2·
    3 years ago

    I think this is an excellent idea, a worthy project, and I applaud you for putting some real thinking into practical steps!

    My federated X wishlist had social media, reddit-like thing, instagram-like thing, and a youtube-like thing. A federated IMDB alternative would be awesome.

  • iortega@lemmy.eus
    2·
    3 years ago

    Just wanted to mention that, according to GNU, Bookwyrm is nonfree because of being licensed under ACSL. I don’t know the implications of this license on forks.

    • Tommi@lemmy.mlOP
      2·
      3 years ago

      To be honest, I do not care. It is important to have the right license, but the value of a software should not be conditioned by license bias. It is a matter that is not strictly and directly related.

      Software comes first, license comes close, but still second to it.

    • Tommi@lemmy.mlOP
      1·
      3 years ago

      I don’t know… maybe having little, super effective and specific platforms is better than one where you try to include most of the features possible. That’s the awesomeness of the Fediverse! As long as there is seamless interoperability, anything goes smoothly.

  • wiki_me@lemmy.ml
    1·
    3 years ago

    You might want to post a bounty on it on rysolv (or some better platform if you can find one), That might be a “stronger” or more persuasive signal then posting on social media.

    • Tommi@lemmy.mlOP
      1·
      3 years ago

      It might be, but IMDb, as all Big Tech companies (it is owned by Amazon) is successfully settling on territories where before there were other smaller services, among them Trakt.

  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
    01·
    3 years ago

    I asked them if it’s possible and they said yes if you modify the back end, but I don’t think they have time to maintain two projects like this. :/

    If you get yourself a Python developer which isn’t that crazy you could do it though.

    • smallcircles@lemmy.ml
      2·
      3 years ago

      The question is whether the project should be forked into multiple separate projects at all. An alternative would be to have a generic “Directory Platform” and have modules to make it a Book Review platform, a Movie Database, or whatever-you-wanna-collect platform with another module. The modules would mostly be templates and data structures + user interface widgets to present them nicely.